27.1.13

How to Subdue an Eagle


The "cold war" was never over.  The communists merely conceded defeat to buy time to regroup and rebuild--this time vowing not to make the same mistakes of the past.  America is being prepped for a takeover.

Let's start with this video from WHDT.


When I watched this video, my first question was "Is this a conspiracy theory hoax?"  I wasn't familiar with any WHDT television station.  So, I did a little research, and it seems that WHDT is an actual broadcasting television station out of Stuart, Florida.  You can google it for yourself to find out more about WHDT. 



Consider a few things...

1. China's America problem.

I've long pondered how long China would be willing to wait for a return on their American investment.  Since 2008, I've wondered how antsy China is becoming about the possibility of a total collapse of the American economy.  In case you haven't been paying attention, China has a lot of money tied up in America.
"The rich rules over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender."
(Proverbs 22:7)
Should the American economy collapses, China can either wait for the American economy to revive (who knows how long that would take?), or they could demand payback in the form of American resources.  Resources such as oil, coal, livestock, farming produce, and "rare earth minerals" which America has in abundance and China scours the Earth for.  According to recent estimates, China controls 95% of the world’savailable rare earth minerals.

2. China is preparing for war.

(I got most of this info on China’s war preps from Mac Slavo.  Read his entire article on this here.)

·      The two major baby formula distributors in Australia are unable to keep up with demand for their dry milk formula products. Stores throughout Australia have been left bare of the product due to bulk Chinese exports. I wouldn't believe the hype about the Chinese needing the formula due to the infamous milk scandal that occurred in China.  That happened four years ago which is more than ample enough time to recoup.

3. Russia's America problem.

Russia sees America and Israel as their obstacles to dominance in the Middle East.  Although Obama's resolve to stand by Israel is questionable, at the very least that has not prevented America from maintaining a deterring military presence in the Middle East.  It is the American military presence in the Middle East that Russia and their allies (Iran, Egypt, Hezbollah, Hamas, and  etc.) would like to be rid of.  You see, Israel is sitting on a wealth of newly found oil and natural gas and Russia wants itRussia's allies(Iran, Egypt, Hezbollah, Hamas, and etc.) want to reclaim the land that Israel occupies as per their demonic religious leaders religious decrees.  The fallacy behind their thinking is that Russia and their friends think that Israel relies on America for their security.  However, we as Christians know from the Bible that Israel's security ultimately comes from the Lord:
"For thus says the LORD of hosts: 'He sent Me after glory, to the nations which plunder you; for he who touches you touches the apple of His eye. For surely I will shake My hand against them, and they shall become spoil for their servants. Then you will know that the LORD of hosts has sent Me.'"
(Zechariah 2:8-9)
4. According to renowned expert in geopolitics and international relations, J.R. Nyquist, Russia is preparing for war also.  This info is a little dated (2001).  I looked for more recent updates.  Is no one tracking Russia any more???


5. China and Russia come together to prepare for a common cause.




So, what's stopping them?


One reason why foreign countries never attack the U.S. mainland is because of the U.S. Constitution's 2nd Amendment which states:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
(U.S. Constitution, 2nd Amendment)
Depending on your source of information, anywhere from 39%-50% of all household in America have at least one gun, but since Obama and the Liberals have made it their agenda to try to wrestle more guns away from the citizens, gun sales have gone through the roof.  Many gun and ammo retailers are reporting that they can't keep products on their shelves, the National Rifle Association is reporting that their memberships are skyrocketing, and participation in concealed handgun classes are on the rise.  All of this points to a citizenry that seeks protection and they do not trust their government to do it for them.
“You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.”
(Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II)
China, as well as other countries, knows that even if they were to defeat American military and take out the entire infrastructure of America, there would still be hundreds of millions of gun wielding citizens that would quickly form into an insurmountable militia fighting on their own soil.  Some might say that China could just nuke America, but then how would they get the resources from America that they desire?  China's dilemma is that even if they were to defeat the American military and make puppets out of the politicians (which they have done with so many) how can they lay hands on America's natural resources without encountering an American with a gun?  The answer is that the Americans must first be disarmed.

You see here Obama (as well as others) and the Chinese have a common agenda.  Obama wants bring America to its knees (if not to all together destroy America outright) because he sees America as being the wealthy oppressor for far too long. That's a deep topic that was well investigated and documented by Dinesh D’Souza and others.  I won't get into that here, but if you don't agree, then why in the world have you read this article up to this point? 

As I was saying, Obama and the Chinese both want to disarm Americans for this reason: population control.  History proves it.  No nation in the world has tried to disarm its citizens unless they wanted to control them.  In America's case, Obama works tirelessly with the EPA to keep America from prospering by use of its natural resources (oil, coal, and etc.) so what better way than to make it possible to give these resources to the Chinese in repayment of our debt and at the same time and unarmed citizenry becomes slaves to the government?  Don't believe that Obama wants to give our resources to the Chinese?  He's already doing it!

Obama may try to use the U.N. arms treaty to do itThe Chinese have already demanded that Americans be disarmed.  Now, why would they want America to be unarmed I wonder?  To make invasion a more desirable option?  History reminds us that in the case of Communist China, mass murder by the communist government under Mao Tse-tung was approximately 38 million people!  Yes, this was after they were disarmed.




What about "turning the other cheek"?

Below are some excerpts from "What Does The Bible Say About Gun Control?" by Larry Pratt (which you can read in its entirety here)--an excellent read.  I can't really put it any better than what Mr. Pratt has in this work.
Many people, Christians included, assume that Christ taught pacifism. They cite Matthew 5:38-39 for their proof. In this verse Christ said: "You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also."
The Sermon on the Mount from which this passage is taken deals with righteous personal conduct. In our passage, Christ is clearing up a confusion that had led people to think that conduct proper for the civil government—that is, taking vengeance—was also proper for an individual.
We must also consider what Christ told His disciples in His last hours with them: ". . . But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a sack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one" (Lk. 22:36). Keep in mind that the sword was the finest offensive weapon available to an individual soldier—the equivalent then of a military rifle today.
The Christian pacifist will likely object at this point that only a few hours later, Christ rebuked Peter who used a sword to cut off the ear of Malchus, a servant of the high priest in the company of a detachment of troops. Let us read what Christ said to Peter in Matthew 26:52-54:
Put your sword in its place, for all who take the sword will perish by the sword. Or do you think that I cannot now pray to My Father, and He will provide Me with more than twelve legions of angels? How then could the Scriptures be fulfilled, that it must happen thus?
In the companion passage in John 18, Jesus tells Peter to put his sword away and told him that He had to drink the cup that His Father had given Him. It was not the first time that Christ had to explain to the disciples why He had come to earth. To fulfill the Scriptures, the Son of God had to die for the sin of man since man was incapable of paying for his own sin apart from going to hell. Christ could have saved His life, but then believers would have lost their lives forever in hell. These things became clear to the disciples only after Christ had died and been raised from the dead and the Spirit had come into the world at Pentecost (see Jn. 14:26).
While Christ told Peter to "put your sword in its place," He clearly did not say get rid of it forever. That would have contradicted what He had told the disciples only hours before. Peter’s sword was to protect his own mortal life from danger. His sword was not needed to protect the Creator of the universe and the King of kings.


What I think...

Now, I am not a prophet, but I think this is all setting the stage for the fulfillment of Ezekiel chapters 38 and 39, or what many call the battle of Magog.  In case you didn't know, Magog is Russia and together with Persia (Iran) and a whole host of other nations (Libya, Turkey, and etc.), they will attempt to attack and destroy Israel.  Of course, they will be miserably defeated as God has prophesied. 

However, I think once it becomes clear that America either can't or won't come to Israel's aid, then Russia, Iran, and the rest of their cohorts will be emboldened to strike Israel with confidence of victory.  Unfortunately for them, their grievous error in judgment is that they don't believe that God will protect Israel.

”This is what the LORD says, he who appoints the sun to shine by day, who decrees the moon and stars to shine by night, who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar-- the LORD Almighty is his name: 'Only if these decrees vanish from my sight,' declares the LORD, "will the descendants of Israel ever cease to be a nation before me.'"
Jeremiah 31:35-36

However, how America will become a non-issue to Magog and their buddies is a trickier question to answer.  I can envision only three scenarios at this time:

1. Russia and China coordinate their attacks.  If America is preoccupied with defending itself from China, then Russia may feel that Israel's is theirs for the taking.

2. Multiple nations attack America.  This would be a mixed bag that would include the usual suspects: Russia, China, Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, and various terrorist organizations (Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood, and etc.).  America, either defeated or otherwise preoccupied would be unable to come to Israel's aid thus giving Russian and their allies their perceived opportunity.

3. The Rapture occurs.  Sudden depopulation of America and the world would cause great instability in the world giving Russia and China their opportunities for conquest.

No matter how it goes down, may the Lord's will be done.

In the meantime, Christians need to be packing some heat.


No comments:

Post a Comment